What does non-binding arbitration allow either side to do?

What does non-binding arbitration allow either side to do?

• A. Go to mediation
• B. File a complaint with HR
• C. Go to trial
• D. Negotiate a settlement

Answer: (C)

Non-binding arbitration is a process in which the parties involved present their case to an arbitrator, who then provides a decision. However, this decision does not have the force of a legal judgment, meaning the parties are not obligated to accept it. As a result, either side retains the ability to pursue further legal action if they choose to do so, including taking the matter to trial. This flexibility is a key feature of non-binding arbitration, distinguishing it from binding arbitration, where the decision is final and enforceable. While options like mediation, filing a complaint with HR, or negotiating a settlement are all methods used in conflict resolution, they do not directly relate to the inherent nature of non-binding arbitration. Non-binding arbitration allows for the possibility of escalation to trial if either party is dissatisfied with the arbitrator's ruling, reinforcing the idea that they maintain their legal rights.

Non-binding arbitration is a process in which the parties involved present their case to an arbitrator, who then provides a decision. However, this decision does not have the force of a legal judgment, meaning the parties are not obligated to accept it. As a result, either side retains the ability to pursue further legal action if they choose to do so, including taking the matter to trial. This flexibility is a key feature of non-binding arbitration, distinguishing it from binding arbitration, where the decision is final and enforceable.

While options like mediation, filing a complaint with HR, or negotiating a settlement are all methods used in conflict resolution, they do not directly relate to the inherent nature of non-binding arbitration. Non-binding arbitration allows for the possibility of escalation to trial if either party is dissatisfied with the arbitrator's ruling, reinforcing the idea that they maintain their legal rights.