In the Hopkins v. Price Waterhouse case, what was suggested by a male partner concerning the plaintiff?

In the Hopkins v. Price Waterhouse case, what was suggested by a male partner concerning the plaintiff?

• A. She needed more training
• B. She should become more feminine
• C. She should take on fewer responsibilities
• D. She should be more aggressive

Answer: (B)

In the Hopkins v. Price Waterhouse case, a significant moment involved a male partner commenting on the plaintiff's presentation and demeanor, suggesting that she needed to adopt a more conventionally feminine appearance and behavior to be considered for partnership. This highlights the gender bias that existed in the workplace at the time, where traits typically associated with femininity were unfairly deemed necessary for women to advance in their careers. The suggestion was not about her professional capabilities or responsibilities but rather focused on her gender expression, which underscores the complexities of discrimination based on gender norms. This case played a crucial role in advancing the discussion around gender discrimination in the workplace and emphasized the importance of evaluating individuals based on their qualifications and performance rather than gender stereotypes.

In the Hopkins v. Price Waterhouse case, a significant moment involved a male partner commenting on the plaintiff's presentation and demeanor, suggesting that she needed to adopt a more conventionally feminine appearance and behavior to be considered for partnership. This highlights the gender bias that existed in the workplace at the time, where traits typically associated with femininity were unfairly deemed necessary for women to advance in their careers. The suggestion was not about her professional capabilities or responsibilities but rather focused on her gender expression, which underscores the complexities of discrimination based on gender norms. This case played a crucial role in advancing the discussion around gender discrimination in the workplace and emphasized the importance of evaluating individuals based on their qualifications and performance rather than gender stereotypes.